

- #Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd code#
- #Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd series#
- #Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd free#
Latest thread is linked in the sidebar or pinned on the front page. Rule 1: Tech Support & Issues - Tech Support posts are not allowed. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, rumours, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. So it did not help on the issue of the misuse of the word PhysX, as you answer itself could potential be affected by the same issue.Īnyway I managed to read up on it myself, When I got home from workWelcome to /r/NVIDIA.

Could your answer on itself logically work with exchanging Physics with PhysX? Yes, it would still be a valid answer.

Just like people missuses the words Kleenex or ipod, for tissue paper and mp3 players. People tend to use PhysX to cover non-PhysX physics calculations as well You answer did not resolved the issue on defining the terms. So reusing the terms without defining them is not helping the question on whatever the terms where used correctly. You reused the terms when the issue was in regards to the terms used. This was despite several explanations to him that was not the case.
#Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd series#
As an examples just see the Series Sam thread where a person constantly claimed that using procedures generation methods, would mean everything would be random. Unlike what most people will do: is argue with a closed mind and bring up made-up theories and arguments with no grounds in real world facts.

The fact that i accept the limitations of my knowledge and seek to add onto it, I see that as a good trait of mine. When a person is putting out information that goes again your current information asking into it is considered proper way imho. Part of that is due to the various life cycles of different parts, where a faster CPU simply can't be had between generations, part of that is actual need for compute, and part of it is latency related and all of those parts will likely apply to gaming and other audiovisual real-time simulations in the future.Īsking is how you get information.
#Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd free#
less relevant example: In the enterprise world, hardware acceleration is still a thing enterprises are still buying NICs with ever more hardware offload capability to free up their ever-increasing CPU capacity for their ever-growing service needs. You can define environments and instead of having to do the equivalent of cinematic set design micromanagement, let the engine come up with how the room looks and sounds and 'feels'.Īnd with respect to physics, if you model the structure of the game world, you can let the player use different forces to literally tear it apart.
#Do i need nvidia physx system software if i have amd code#
You can then allow modifications and let the engine code on the GPU handle the changes. wav files for different firearms, for example, you can define a heavy machinegun or small pistol loosely and then fine-tune the output a bit, but do all of that on the GPU. The more data you can put into the models, the more accurate it is instead of loading. everything has physical properties that affect structure, reflectivity, and acoustics. example: Ray tracing can be considered to be a form of 'physics' calculation, as can acoustic wave bounces as game environments get more sophisticated especially with the advent of VR, putting all of the 'simulation' data on the GPU might be adventageous. With respect to physics, running it on a GPU when trying to do more than basic stuff can make sense and probably will make sense at some point. To a degree- there's still plenty of usefulness for hardware offload though, of course.
